Articles


Sunday Journal at St. Petersburg Times

Writing Semper Fi, by Keith Laufenberg

 

It was suggested to me that I write an article about writing the 400 page novel 
Semper-Fi-Do-Or-Die and I have decided to take up that challenge.

Semper-Fi was a story that I knew that I wanted to write and indeed felt I had
to write, almost from the time I got out of the Marine Corps but it took me
many, many years of writing poems and short stories before I felt I was ready
to take on this task which I first approached in the early 1980's, and very
hesitantly. I knew what I wanted to write and I knew exactly that it would be
divided into four parts (books). A writer is lucky if he has this vision before
he even begins writing. Some stories you just begin and the story progresses as
you go, as in many of the poems and short stories I have written, but
sometimes, as in this case, you have this vision, as I did. This is usually
true for me when I have lived through either part or all, of the story
personally, as I had in this case. But I had a dilemma and that dilemma was
reality vs. research.

What I mean by that is that I knew that I had to include the Vietnam War in a
book about the Marine Corps set in the 60's and 70's and I hadn't served in
Vietnam. I knew that anyone who read the book would take it for granted that
the author had been in the Corps and had served in Vietnam. I was in the Corps,
for 3 years, but never in Vietnam and so I knew that the first two parts
(books) would be, and were, easier to write than the last two.

It took me twice as long to write Book Three and Four as it did to write Book
One and Two and that was due primarily to research but a funny thing happened
in my search for the truth, which, by the way, is what every writer is
searching for when he writes anything, in my opinion. The funny thing that
happened is that, after many, many months of research and many first drafts, I
came to the conclusion that Book Three and Book Four were going to be more
fulfilling and maybe even more truthful than Book One and Book Two, even though
I had lived through the first two books and did almost no research when I wrote
them. How can this be then, if truth is, as they say, the daughter of Time. I
think that is, indeed, exactly, why, because time not only reveals truth but
blurs the mind to the exactness of it and so if we are all given but partial
and fragmented glimpses of the truth, and not pure truth, then the more that
one glimpses this truth the better a story can he write. And
so saying this, I was only one who wrote Book One and Book Two, by his own
recollections, but Book Three and Book Four were written by many, like my good
friend Dennis Byrne, who served in Vietnam or his brothers Jackie and Jerry, or
my neighbor Richard Anway, another Nam vet, along with dozens of others that I
spoke with or whose story's I read in one book or another. Of course this is a
novel and, I suppose you could say that, because of that, I shouldn't worry
about the truth of it but, on the contrary, I believe it is possible to
actually get as much truth from a novel as it is from what claims to be a
factual report because in a factual report everything has to usually be cleared
by those in power and those in power very seldom wish to hear the truth and
therefore, as Voltaire said, he who seeks truth should be of no country.And
also, those factual reports are almost always written and/or reported by more
than just one person. It is my belief that a writer can get
more truth alone if he only owes his allegiance to the truth, which is to say
to God. Just as daylight follows the night the light shall overcome the
darkness in the end and truth shall prevail and, I believe, that when that
truth concerns a war such as Vietnam, which is almost identical to Iraq in its
absurdity, and who we're fighting and why we're there, than it is critical that
the truth prevail if there is even a smithereens of a chance that it could
help to prevent an escalation in Iraq or another war, because, in the end, any
novel, or factual book or report, on a war should be anti-war, because if it
shows the reality of war then who could be in favor of that, more, war.

And so, I believe I have written as fairly and truthfully this book that I call
'Semper-Fi-Do-Or-Die'.

Yet the deepest truths are best read between the lines, and, for the most part,
refuse to be written.---Amos Bronson Alcott, Concord Days: June.

But, I wish to contend that in Semper-Fi, the truth refused NOT to be written
and was written as best that I could write it.

Pure truth hath no man seen nor e'er shall know.---Xenophanes, Fragments. No.
34.

What shall I tell Xenophanes then?

I shall tell him that even if he is right, that man still seeks this truth, and
even if the light shines too brightly for us to see this truth, then we shall
write it down, quickly, so that we may know it when it does come and when we
do see it.

And, as long as we have a breath in our bodies we shall search for it and then
have the guts and faith to proclaim it, whether it is popular or not and
whether it hurts you or not.

I have found that the harder it is to write something the more a writer should
attempt to write it and that's why I wrote this short piece that you have just
read.

Source: http://www.freelists.org/archives/authorme/06-2007/msg00000.html


Welcome
About
Books and Stories
Interviews/Reviews
Book Clubs
Articles
Links
Contact Keith
e-mail me